The future of the creator of images will continue to be that of the one who is capable of making images say something. Therefore what is important first is to have something to say and then know how to articulate a certain visual discourse that effectively supports this type of content that is intended to be transmitted. fontcuberta Joan Fontcuberta OC I think that deep down it is very difficult to lose the notion of photography as a communicative act. You have expressed it as a speech which can be understood as a reflection or reasoning also to express what is thought. The idea of discourse has to do with a possible doctrine or ideology.
I like to think of discourse as a cultural fact that manifests e-commerce photo editing itself in that which again Francisco Mata Rosas synthesizes as the point of view. The speech is also a message which is a deep meaning a background that underlies the photograph or the image. I agree with you in the speech as a fundamental element in the image. communication Now in that having to say that you mention it seems to me that there is something that goes beyond reasoning and it is the need to express sometimes a logical discourse but frequently also a feeling an emotion.
So photography the image if you want to see it in extenso is a possibility in which the author can transmit a message state what he feels or thinks about a subject and then articulates the discourse you were talking about to shape a communication vehicle. I think that just like this dialogue the image is a possibility to generate a communicating vessel between the creator of the image or prescriber of meaning if you will and the observer. It does not matter if it is the first calotypes of William Henry Fox Talbot Richard Avedon s Marilyn and Hilla Becher in all cases the viewer is confronted with a vehicle of communication with a message.
發表於 2022-9-7 16:33:10
